Historical Records of the Murray River

From EnvironmentWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

--Nichole Hoskin 10:37, 25 July 2008 (EST)


Charles Sturt's Diary of his Expedition down the Murray River

--Nichole Hoskin 09:42, 31 July 2008 (EST)

Arriving at the end of the Murray River:

"After pulling a mile or two, we found a clear horizon before us to the south. The hills still continued upon our left, but we could not see any elevation over the expanse of reeds to our right. The river inclined to the left, and swept the base of the hills that still continued on that side. I consequently landed once more to survey the country. I still retained a strong impression on my mind that some change was at hand, and on this occasion, I was not disappointed; but the view was one for which I was not altogether prepared. We had, at length, arrived at the termination of the Murray. Immediately below me was a beautiful lake, which appeared to be a fitting reservoir for the noble stream that had led us to it; and which was now ruffled by the breeze that swept over it." [1]


“Thirty-three days had now passed over our heads since we left the depôt upon the Morumbidgee, twenty-six of which had been passed upon the Murray. We had, at length, arrived at the grand reservoir of those waters whose course and fate had previously been involved in such obscurity. It remained for us to ascertain whether the extensive sheet of water upon whose bosom we had embarked, had any practicable communication with the ocean, and whether the country in the neighbourhood of the coast corresponded with that immediately behind our camp, or kept up its sandy and sterile character to the very verge of the sea.”[2]


Uncertainty about whether the lake meets the sea:

“Even while gazing on this fine scene, I could not but regret that the Murray had thus terminated; for I immediately foresaw that, in all probability, we should be disappointed in finding any practicable communication between the lake and the ocean, as it was evident that the former was not much influenced by tides. The wind had again increased; it still blew fresh from the S. W., and a heavy sea was rolling direct into the mouth of the river.”[3]


“We had again placed sticks to ascertain with more precision the rise of tide, and found it to be the same as in the river. In the stillness of the night too we thought we heard the roaring of the sea, but I was myself uncertain upon the point, as the wind might have caused the sound. From the top of the hill from which we had obtained our first view of the lake, I observed the waves breaking upon the distant head-land, and enveloping the cliff in spray; so that, independent of the clearness of the horizon beyond it, I was further led to conclude that there existed a great expanse of water to the S. W.; and, as that had been the direction taken by the river, I thought it probable that by steering at once to the S. W. down the lake, I should hit the outlet. I, consequently, resolved to gain the southern extremity of the lake, as that at which it was natural to expect a communication with the ocean would be found.”[4]


Finding salt water in the Lake:

“Thus far, the waters of the lake had continued sweet; but on filling a can when we were abreast of this point, it was found that they were quite unpalateable, to say the least of them. The transition from fresh to salt water was almost immediate, and it was fortunate we made the discovery in sufficient time to prevent our losing ground. But, as it was, we filled our casks, and stood on, without for a moment altering our course.”[5]


Finding the channel linking the lake to the sea

“At this time there was an open sea from W. N. W. to N. by E. A meridian altitude gave our latitude 35° 25'. The land to our left was bold and precipitous; that to the right was low and wooded; and there was evidently a considerable space between the shores of the lake and the base of the ranges. The country to the eastward was hidden from us by the line of cliffs, beyond which, from E. S. E. to W. S. W. there was an open sea. We had kept the lead going from the first, and I was surprised at the extreme shallowness of the lake in every part, as we never had six feet upon the line. Its bottom was one of black mud, and weeds of enormous length were floating on its surface, detached by the late gales, and which, from the shallowness of the lake, got constantly entangled with our rudder.”[6]


“On a nearer approach, the phantom disappeared, and a clear and open sea again presented itself to our view. The fact was, that the refractive power upon the coast had elevated the sand hillocks above their true position, since we satisfactorily ascertained that they alone separated the lake from the ocean, and they alone could have produced the semblance we noticed. It is a singular fact, that this very hillock was the one which Capt. Barker ascended whilst carrying on the survey of the south coast, and immediately previous to his tragical death.”[7]


“It was now near sunset; and one of the most lovely evenings I had ever seen. The sun's radiance was yet upon the mountains, but all lower objects were in shade. The banks of the channel, with the trees and the rocks, were reflected in the tranquil waters, whose surface was unruffled save by the thousands of wild fowl that rose before us, and made a noise as of a multitude clapping hands, in their clumsy efforts to rise from the waters. Not one of them allowed us to get within shot. We proceeded about a mile below the hill on which the natives were posted; some few still following us with violent threats. We landed, however, on a flat, bounded all round by the continuation of the hills. It was an admirable position, for, in the centre of it, we could not be taken by surprise, and, on the other hand, we gave the natives an opportunity of communicating with us if they would. The full moon rose as we were forming the camp, and, notwithstanding our vicinity to so noisy a host, the silence of death was around us, or the stillness of the night was only broken by the roar of the ocean, now too near to be mistaken for wind, or by the silvery and melancholy note of the black swans as they passed over us, to seek for food, no doubt, among the slimy weeds at the head of the lake. We had been quite delighted with the beauty of the channel, which was rather more than half-a-mile in width. Numberless mounds, that seemed to invite civilised man to erect his dwelling upon them, presented themselves to our view. The country round them was open, yet ornamentally wooded, and rocks and trees hung or drooped over the waters.”[8]


“To our right the thunder of the heavy surf, that almost shook the ground beneath us, broke with increasing roar upon our ears; to our left the voice of the natives echoed through the brush, and the size of their fires at the extremity of the channel, seemed to indicate the alarm our appearance had occasioned.” [9]


“The current in the Murray from the lake, to within a short distance of this singular turn in it, is weak, since its bed is almost on a level with the lake. The channel, which, at the termination, is somewhat more than the third of a mile across, gradually diminishes in breadth, as the interior is gained, but is no where under 300 yards; while its depth averages from eighteen to thirty feet, within a foot of the very bank. The river might, therefore, be navigated by boats of considerable burden, if the lake admitted of the same facility; but I am decidedly of opinion, that the latter is generally shallow, and that it will, in the course of years, be filled up by depositions. It is not, however, an estuary in any sense of the word, since no part of it is exposed at low water, excepting the flats in the channel, and the flat between the lake and the sea.”[10]


Sturt names the Lake at the end of the Murray River:

“Yet, reduced as the whole of us were from previous exertion, beset as our homeward path was by difficulty and danger, and involved as our eventual safety was in obscurity and doubt, I could not but deplore the necessity that obliged me to re-cross the Lake Alexandrina (as I had named it in honour of the heir apparent to the British crown), and to relinquish the examination of its western shores.”[11]


Further exploration of Lake Alexandrina required:

“But, although I was guarded in this particular, I strongly recommended a further examination of the coast, from the most eastern point of Encounter Bay, to the head St. Vincent's Gulf, to ascertain if any other than the known channel existed among the sand-hills of the former, or if, as I had every reason to hope from the great extent of water to the N. W., there was a practicable communication with the lake from the other; and I ventured to predict, that a closer survey of the interjacent country, would be attended with the most beneficial results; nor have I a doubt that the promontory of Cape Jervis would ere this have been settled, had Captain Barker lived to complete his official reports.”[12]


Captain Barker explores the channel:

“Captain Barker, therefore, ascended to higher ground, and, at length, obtained a view of the Lake Alexandrina, and the channel of its communication with the sea to the N. E.”[13]


“At the termination of the flat they found themselves upon the banks of the channel, and close to the sand hillock under which my tents had been pitched. From this point they proceeded along the line of sand-hills to the outlet; from which it would appear that Kangaroo Island is not visible, but that the distant point which I mistook for it was the S.E. angle of Cape Jervis.”[14]


“Captain Barker judged the breadth of the channel to be a quarter of a mile, and he expressed a desire to swim across it to the sand-hill to take bearings, and to ascertain the nature of the strand beyond it to the eastward.”[15]

Pictures of the Murray River: historical and recent

--Nichole Hoskin 09:43, 31 July 2008 (EST)

Image:Dry Murray 1915.jpg Dry Murray River, 1915, at the Homestead of Riversdale


Image:Riversdale_10092006.jpg

Riversdale, September 2006, photograph by Daryl McDonald


Image:Riversdale_026_wiki.jpg

Riversdale, November 21, 2007, photograph by Jennifer Marohasy

References

1. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 157.

2. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 158.

3. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 158.

4. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, pp 160-161.

5. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, pp 161-162.

6. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 163.

7. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 164.

8. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, pp 166-167.

9. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 172.

10. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 190.

11. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 229.

12. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, pp 230-231.

13. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 239.

14. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 239.

15. Charles Sturt, Two Expeditions into the Interior of Southern Australia During the years 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1831: with observations on the soil, climate, and general resources of the colony of New South Wales, p 239.

Personal tools