<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Jennifer Marohasy</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/" />
<modified>2008-05-16T09:14:34Z</modified>
<tagline>Your Politics and Environment Blog with Paul, Jen &amp; Neil.</tagline>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.2">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, Paul</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Battle of the Blogs: Do Observations Falsify IPCC Projections?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003069.html" />
<modified>2008-05-16T09:14:34Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-16T08:54:14Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3069</id>
<created>2008-05-16T08:54:14Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In the blue corner we have Roger Pielke Jr (Prometheus) and Lucia Liljegren (The Blackboard). In the red corner we have James Annan (James&apos; Empty Blog) and Gavin Schmidt (RealClimate). Interestingly, all four of the contenders accept the the IPCC...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>In  the blue corner we have Roger Pielke Jr (<a href="http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/">Prometheus</a>) and Lucia Liljegren (<a href="http://rankexploits.com/musings/2008/ipcc-projections-do-falsify-or-are-swedes-tall/">The Blackboard</a>). In the red corner we have James Annan (<a href="http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2008/05/consistently-wrong-chronicles.html">James' Empty Blog</a>) and Gavin Schmidt (<a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/05/what-the-ipcc-models-really-say/langswitch_lang/th">RealClimate</a>).</p>

<p>Interestingly, all four of the contenders accept the the IPCC consensus view on climate change, but Pielke Jr/Liljegren show that IPCC projections are currently falsified by observations, whereas Annan/Schmidt have the opposite view. Read the various blog posts and make up your own minds.</p>

<p>Lucia <a href="http://rankexploits.com/musings/2008/ipcc-projections-do-falsify-or-are-swedes-tall/">Concludes</a>:</p>

<p>The IPCC projections remain falsified. Comparison to data suggest they are biased. The statistical tests accounts for the actual weather noise in data on earth. </p>

<p>The argument that this falsification is somehow inapplicable because the earth data falls inside the full range of possibilities for models is flawed. We know why the full range of climate models is huge: It contains a large amount of “climate model noise” due to models that are individually biased relative to the system of interest: the earth. </p>

<p>It will continue to admit what I have always admitted: When applying hypothesis tests to a confidence limit of 5%, one does expect to be wrong 5% of the time. It is entirely possible that the current falsification fall in the category of 5% incorrect falsifications. If this is so, the “falsified” diagnosis will reverse, and not we won’t see another one anytime soon.</p>

<p>However, for now, the IPCC projections remain falsified, and will do so until the temperatures pick up. Given the current statistical state ( a period when large “type 2″ error is expected) it is quite likely we will soon see “fail to falsify” even if the current falsification is a true one. But if the falsification is a “true” falsification, as is most likely, we will see “falsifications” resume. In that case, the falsification will ultimately stick.</p>

<p>For now, all we can do is watch the temperature trends of the real earth.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>World Wildlife Populations &apos;Plummeting&apos;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003068.html" />
<modified>2008-05-16T07:29:12Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-16T07:25:19Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3068</id>
<created>2008-05-16T07:25:19Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Between a quarter and a third of the world&apos;s wildlife has been lost since 1970, according to data compiled by the Zoological Society of London. Populations of land-based species fell by 25%, marine by 28% and freshwater by 29%, it...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Biodiversity, Animals (Part 2)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Between a quarter and a third of the world's wildlife has been lost since 1970, according to data compiled by the Zoological Society of London. </p>

<p>Populations of land-based species fell by 25%, marine by 28% and freshwater by 29%, it says. </p>

<p>Humans are wiping out about 1% of all other species every year, and one of the "great extinction episodes" in the Earth's history is under way, it says. </p>

<p>Pollution, farming and urban expansion, over-fishing and hunting are blamed. </p>

<p>BBC News Website: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7403989.stm">Wildlife populations 'plummeting' </a><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Climate Science Round Up from This Week&apos;s Nature</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003065.html" />
<modified>2008-05-15T07:37:32Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-15T06:34:30Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3065</id>
<created>2008-05-15T06:34:30Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Quenching forest fires leads to more carbon in the air, says new research carried out in Californian forests. The discovery suggests that forests spared from fire may release more of the greenhouse gas into the air than they absorb. Decades...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Quenching forest fires leads to more carbon in the air, says new research carried out in Californian forests. The discovery suggests that forests spared from fire may release more of the greenhouse gas into the air than they absorb.</p>

<p>Decades of suppressing natural fires has increased the number of surviving trees in California's forests. But this growth has been at the expense of larger trees, which are less resilient to drought and other stresses than smaller, younger trees, resulting in a decline in the total amount of carbon stored in these forests.</p>

<p>Nature News.com: <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080514/full/news.2008.818.html#B1">Forest-fire management 'raises carbon emissions'</a></p>

<p>Governments should work together to build the supercomputers needed for future predictions that can capture the detail required to inform policy.</p>

<p>Few scientific creations have had greater impact on public opinion and policy than computer models of Earth's climate. These models, which unanimously show a rising tide of red as temperatures climb worldwide, have been key over the past decade in forging the scientific and political consensus that global warming is a grave danger.</p>

<p>Now that that consensus is all but universal, climate modellers are looking to take the next step, and to convert their creations from harbingers of doom to tools of practical policy. That means making their simulations good enough to guide hard decisions, from targets for carbon dioxide emissions on a global scale to the adaptations required to meet changing rainfall and extreme weather events on regional and local scales.</p>

<p>Today's modelling efforts, though, are not up to that job. They all agree on the general direction in which the climate will move as greenhouse gases build up, but they do not reliably capture all the nuances of today's climate, let alone tomorrow's. Moreover, each model differs from reality in different ways.</p>

<p>Editorial: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/453257a.html">The next big climate challenge</a></p>

<p>Methane outbursts from seafloor deposits are unlikely to have been the sole cause of an extreme episode of global warming around the time of the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum some 55 million years ago.</p>

<p>Research Highlights: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/453260c.html">Palaeoclimate: Methane didn't act alone</a></p>

<p>Data laboriously extracted from an Antarctic ice core provide an unprecedented view of temperature, and levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and methane, over the past 800,000 years of Earth's history.</p>

<p>The data further reinforce the tight link between greenhouse gases and climate, a link maintained by as-yet only partially understood feedbacks in the Earth system. Variations in methane levels are most probably caused by variations in the influence of temperature and rainfall on wetlands in the tropics and boreal (high-northern-latitude) regions. Carbon dioxide variability is almost universally viewed as an oceanic phenomenon, a consequence of the large pools of carbon sequestered there. Changes in ocean circulation, biological productivity, carbon dioxide solubility and other aspects of ocean chemistry have been implicated, but the exact mix of mechanisms is not clear.</p>

<p>News and Views: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/453291a.html">Palaeoclimate: Windows on the greenhouse</a></p>

<p>The climate is changing, and so are aspects of the world's physical and biological systems. It is no easy matter to link cause and effect — the latest attack on the problem brings the power of meta-analysis to bear. It uses a larger database than the recent IPCC report, and it takes account of land-use change and other complications. The authors conclude that anthropogenic climate change is affecting physical and biological systems globally. But as Francis Zwiers and Gabriele Hegerl point out in News & Views, this proof based on the principle of joint attribution stops short of the statistical certainty that would be provided by 'end-to-end' models linking human activity directly to the observed changes, rather than via effects on the climate system.</p>

<p>News and Views: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/453296a.html">Climate change: Attributing cause and effect</a></p>

<p>Significant changes in physical and biological systems are occurring on all continents and in most oceans, with a concentration of available data in Europe and North America. Most of these changes are in the direction expected with warming temperature. Here we show that these changes in natural systems since at least 1970 are occurring in regions of observed temperature increases, and that these temperature increases at continental scales cannot be explained by natural climate variations alone. Given the conclusions from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report that most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-twentieth century is very likely to be due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, and furthermore that it is likely that there has been significant anthropogenic warming over the past 50 years averaged over each continent except Antarctica, we conclude that anthropogenic climate change is having a significant impact on physical and biological systems globally and in some continents.</p>

<p>Article: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/abs/nature06937.html">Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change</a></p>

<p>Changes in past atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations can be determined by measuring the composition of air trapped in ice cores from Antarctica. So far, the Antarctic Vostok and EPICA Dome C ice cores have provided a composite record of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels over the past 650,000 years1, 2, 3, 4. Here we present results of the lowest 200 m of the Dome C ice core, extending the record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration by two complete glacial cycles to 800,000 yr before present. From previously published data1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and the present work, we find that atmospheric carbon dioxide is strongly correlated with Antarctic temperature throughout eight glacial cycles but with significantly lower concentrations between 650,000 and 750,000 yr before present. Carbon dioxide levels are below 180 parts per million by volume (p.p.m.v.) for a period of 3,000 yr during Marine Isotope Stage 16, possibly reflecting more pronounced oceanic carbon storage. We report the lowest carbon dioxide concentration measured in an ice core, which extends the pre-industrial range of carbon dioxide concentrations during the late Quaternary by about 10 p.p.m.v. to 172–300 p.p.m.v.</p>

<p>Letter: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/abs/nature06949.html">High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present</a></p>

<p>Atmospheric methane is an important greenhouse gas and a sensitive indicator of climate change and millennial-scale temperature variability1. Its concentrations over the past 650,000 years have varied between 350 and 800 parts per 109 by volume (p.p.b.v.) during glacial and interglacial periods, respectively2. In comparison, present-day methane levels of 1,770 p.p.b.v. have been reported3. Insights into the external forcing factors and internal feedbacks controlling atmospheric methane are essential for predicting the methane budget in a warmer world3. Here we present a detailed atmospheric methane record from the EPICA Dome C ice core that extends the history of this greenhouse gas to 800,000 yr before present. The average time resolution of the new data is 380 yr and permits the identification of orbital and millennial-scale features. Spectral analyses indicate that the long-term variability in atmospheric methane levels is dominated by 100,000 yr glacial–interglacial cycles up to 400,000 yr ago with an increasing contribution of the precessional component during the four more recent climatic cycles. We suggest that changes in the strength of tropical methane sources and sinks (wetlands, atmospheric oxidation), possibly influenced by changes in monsoon systems and the position of the intertropical convergence zone, controlled the atmospheric methane budget, with an additional source input during major terminations as the retreat of the northern ice sheet allowed higher methane emissions from extending periglacial wetlands. Millennial-scale changes in methane levels identified in our record as being associated with Antarctic isotope maxima events1, 4 are indicative of ubiquitous millennial-scale temperature variability during the past eight glacial cycles.</p>

<p>Letter: <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/abs/nature06950.html">Orbital and millennial-scale features of atmospheric CH4 over the past 800,000 years</a></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>We Live in an Electric Universe (Part 3) by Louis Hissink</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003062.html" />
<modified>2008-05-15T00:45:01Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-15T00:33:53Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3062</id>
<created>2008-05-15T00:33:53Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In a NASA media release entitled ‘Electric Hurricanes’ it was suggested that because Emily, Rita and Katrina were all exceptionally powerful hurricanes, their sheer violence somehow explains their lightning. But in the same media release, Richard Blakeslee, from the Global...</summary>
<author>
<name>jennifer</name>
<url>http://www.jennifermarohasy.com</url>
<email>jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Clouds</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>In a NASA media release entitled <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jan_electrichurricanes.htm">‘Electric Hurricanes’ </a> it was suggested that because Emily, Rita and Katrina were all exceptionally powerful hurricanes, their sheer violence somehow explains their lightning. But in the same media release, Richard Blakeslee, from the Global Hydrology and Climate Centre, says that this explanation is too simple. </p>

<p>"Other storms have been equally intense and did not produce much lightning," he says. "There must be something else at work."<br />
 <br />
That "something else at work" is the electric Birkeland currents that power the hurricanes, operating in dark current plasma mode, so little or no lightning is observed. </p>

<p>Birkeland currents are really filaments of electric current that from magnetic attraction are free to rotate around each other, but at the same time coming closer together generates a short range repulsive force that insulates them from each other, thereby maintaining their identity and forming a twisting rope that as the filaments get closer, just like a spinning ice skater bringing in her arms, start to spin even faster.  Paired Birkelands are really just electric whirlwinds or a plasma vortex. </p>

<p>The movement of hurricanes over the earth’s surface seems much like that observed for sunspots.</p>

<p>Kristian Birkeland showed the gross features of sunspots in his Terrella experiments where electric discharges, from a donut of plasma around the magnetised sphere, move from mid to low latitudes on the sphere as the electric current increased.</p>

<p><br />
<img alt="Hissink_part3_Figure 1.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/Hissink_part3_Figure%201.jpg" width="746" height="280" /><br />
<em>The sun’s plasma torus in UV from the SOHO Mission.</em></p>

<p><br />
The simplest model for the 22 year magnetic sunspot cycle involves modulation of the electrical power input from the galaxy to the solar circuitry which seems to behave like a secondary winding on a transformer responding to varying DC currents to produce a magnetic field which switches polarity.</p>

<p>The earth is linked to the sun by enormous magnetic flux ropes (or Birkeland currents), and from the behaviour of the auroras and sunspot activity it is entirely likely that the earth’s weather might also be an electrical phenomenon linked to the magnetosphere.</p>

<p><br />
<img alt="Hissink_Part 3_Figure 2.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/Hissink_Part%203_Figure%202.jpg" width="400" height="258" /><br />
<em>Birkeland rope</em></p>

<p><br />
Louis Hissink<br />
Perth</p>

<p>We Live in an Electric Universe, Part 1<br />
<a href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003038.html ">http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003038.html </a></p>

<p>We Live in an Electric Universe, Part 2  <br />
<a href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003047.html ">http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003047.html </a><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Activism on Carbon Emissions Built on Specious Data?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003061.html" />
<modified>2008-05-15T00:04:53Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T23:59:18Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3061</id>
<created>2008-05-14T23:59:18Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">“Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA) is a massive database containing information on the carbon emissions of over 50,000 power plants and 4,000 power companies worldwide. Power generation accounts for 40% of all carbon emissions in the United States and about...</summary>
<author>
<name>jennifer</name>
<url>http://www.jennifermarohasy.com</url>
<email>jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Energy</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>“Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA) is a massive database containing information on the carbon emissions of over 50,000 power plants and 4,000 power companies worldwide. Power generation accounts for 40% of all carbon emissions in the United States and about one-quarter of global emissions. CARMA is the first global inventory of a major, emissions-producing sector of the economy.” At least that is according to CARMA an initiative of the Center for Global Development, a Washington-based think tank.</p>

<p>But according to environmental consultant Shakeb Afsah, of <a href="http://www.performeks.com/ ">Performeks</a>, the overall data and the analytical architecture of CARMA are flawed.   Afsah’s findings are detailed in a new report <a href="http://climatedataduediligence.org/reports.aspx ">‘Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA): Climate Activism Built on Specious Data’</a> at a new website, <a href="http://www.climatedataduediligence.org">www.climatedataduediligence.org</a>. </p>

<p>Afsah says he arrived at this conclusion by checking the following: 1) the precision of CARMA’s ranking, (2) the extent of the numerical differences between CARMA’s and USEPA’s annual CO2 estimates, (3) the lack of correlation between CARMA’s and USEPA’s carbon intensity values, (4) the predictable pattern of error in CARMA’s annual CO2 estimates, and (5) the logical and quantitative inconsistencies in CARMA’s next decade predictions of CO2 emissions. This report concludes that CARMA’s statistical methodology for estimating CO2 emissions of power plants is incompatible with the protocols for CO2 monitoring and verification recommended by the US Government, IPCC and the European Commission. Because climate management requires considerable coordination across countries, CARMA’s conflicting methodology, data and results can upset the fledgling progress towards international consensus.</p>

<p>According to the CARMA website they are very proud of the data they provide to users, but are also keen for feedback.  </p>

<p>But according to Afsah, he first informed CARMA’s about data quality issues on December 4, 2007, and after five months there has been no serious response or suggested disclaimer on the CARMA website.<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>U.S. Lists Polar Bears as &apos;Threatened&apos;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003060.html" />
<modified>2008-05-14T20:47:17Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T20:38:09Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3060</id>
<created>2008-05-14T20:38:09Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">WASHINGTON, DC – Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, today expressed disappointment with the U.S. Department of Interior&apos;s final decision to list the polar bear as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. “Unfortunately,...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Biodiversity, Animals (Part 2)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, DC – Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, today expressed disappointment with the U.S. Department of Interior's final decision to list the polar bear as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act.</p>

<p>“Unfortunately, the decision to list the polar bear as ‘threatened’ appears to be based more on politics than science,” Senator Inhofe said. “With the number of polar bears substantially up over the past forty years, the decision announced today appears to be based entirely on unproven computer models. The decision, therefore, is simply a case of reality versus unproven computer models, the methodology of which has been challenged by many scientists and forecasting experts. If the models are invalid, then the decision based on them is not justified. It’s disappointing that Secretary Kempthorne failed to stand up to liberal special interest groups who advocated this listing.</p>

<p>“Lost in the debate is the fact that polar bear numbers have dramatically increased over the past forty years – a fact even liberal environmental activists are forced to concede. According to Canadian scientists, 11 of the 13 bear populations are stable, with some increasing. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service now estimates that there are currently 20,000 to 25,000 polar bears. These numbers are substantially up from lows estimates in the range of 5,000-10,000 in the 1950s and 1960s. Credit should be given to protection already provided the polar bear by way of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the several international conservation treaties including the 1973 Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears and the U.S.-Russia Polar Bear Conservation and Management Act of 2006, as well as conservation, education, and outreach agreement with native peoples.</p>

<p>“Today’s decision will have far reaching consequences. Liberal special interests have employed hundreds of lawyers to try and convert current environmental laws such as the Endangered Species Act into climate laws. Yet the ESA is simply not equipped to regulate economy-wide greenhouse gases, nor does the Fish and Wildlife Service have the expertise to be a pollution control agency.  The regulatory tools of the ESA function best when at-risk species are faced with local, tangible threats.  Greenhouse gas emissions are not local. The implications of today’s decision, therefore, will undoubtedly lead to a drastic increase in litigation and eager lawyers ready to use this listing to do exactly what they have intended to do all along – shut down energy production.” </p>

<p>Press Release: <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=e8b76795-802a-23ad-4c8b-089a6b4c03fe">Inhofe Says Listing of Polar Bear Based on Politics, Not Science</a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Wheeler&apos;s Climate Cycles</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003059.html" />
<modified>2008-05-14T16:03:33Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T15:33:50Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3059</id>
<created>2008-05-14T15:33:50Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A letter that was recently published in the UK Daily Mail about the work of Raymond H Wheeler prompted me to find out more: Professor Raymond H. Wheeler (University of Kansas) compiled 20 centuries of historical records, and concluded from...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>A letter that was recently published in the UK <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/dailymail/home.html?in_page_id=1766">Daily Mail </a>about the work of Raymond H Wheeler prompted me to find out more:</p>

<p>Professor Raymond H. Wheeler (University of Kansas) compiled 20 centuries of historical records, and concluded from his studies that there exists a most important 100-year-cycle of climatic changes that influences human affairs in a profound manner.</p>

<p>The cycle occurs in four distinct phases, which are descriptive of worldwide conditions rather than specific areas. The four phases are disturbed by secondary leads and delays --- as much as 10 years --- in isolated and widely separated areas. Prof Wheeler stated:</p>

<p>"The climatic curve is intended to represent --- as far as one curve can --- the weather trend in the world as a whole at any one time. The curve has no absolute significance. The meaning of the curve at any one time is relative to the pattern of the 100-year old cycle as a whole."</p>

<p>The 100-year weather cycle and its phases are not of precisely equal duration. The cycle can contract to 70 years or expand to 120. The cycle is divided into a warm and a cold phase, each of which has a wet and dry period. Because people are affected by weather, the cycles of weather produce similar patterns of behaviour and events in history during the same phases of the century-long weather cycle. The phases are: (1) Cold-Dry, (2) Warm-Wet, (3) Warm-Dry, and (4) Cold-Wet. We are now in a cold-dry phase, which will prevail until about 2000 A.D.<br />
Dr. Wheeler extended his research to reveal a continuous, universal cultural pattern of "mechanism" alternating with "humanism" that occurs throughout history synchronously with the 100-year weather cycle...................</p>

<p>I find this phrase uncannily representative of the modern warm period:</p>

<p>"Second, the decline, onset of decadence, the growing excesses of centralized government, the emergence of dictators, tyranny, fanaticism, communism, and socialism, as the warm epoch continued, and as temperatures and dryness increased."</p>

<p>Most of the material that we have about Wheeler is found in the book <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Climate-key-understanding-business-cycles/dp/B00072QWYY/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210779951&sr=1-4">Climate: The Key To Understanding Business Cycles by Raymond Wheeler, (Revised & Edited by Michael Zahorchak)</a>. This volume summarizes Raymond H. Wheeler's extensive research with long climatic cycles and their relationship to the business cycle. In the 1930's Wheeler began a lifetime study that analysed world climate and cultural activities back to the dawn of recorded civilization.</p>

<p>Wheeler was also the creator of a huge volume known as "The Big Book" which was housed at the Foundation for the Study of Cycles until the late 1990s.</p>

<p>Cycles Research Institute: <a href="http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/wheeler.html">Raymond H Wheeler</a></p>

<p>Letter published in the UK Daily Mail:</p>

<p><img alt="DM letter on Wheeler research, 130508.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/DM%20letter%20on%20Wheeler%20research%2C%20130508.jpg" width="480" height="928" /></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Day of the Electric Car Starts to Dawn</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003058.html" />
<modified>2008-05-14T13:32:56Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T11:54:39Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3058</id>
<created>2008-05-14T11:54:39Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I guess I was about 12 years old (1970) when I made a crude drawing of my design for an electric car. At school we had been told that oil was running out and I had been bought a new...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Energy</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>I guess I was about 12 years old (1970) when I made a crude drawing of my design for an electric car. At school we had been told that oil was running out and I had been bought a new bicycle as a reward for passing the 11-plus exam, which allowed me to go to Grammer School. My bike was a 'state of the art' <a href="http://www.sheldonbrown.com/retroraleighs/rsw.html">Raleigh RSW 16</a> in blue. It had 16 inch white 'balloon' tyres, 3 speed twist grip gears, a rear drum brake, and a front <a href="http://images.andale.com/f2/115/106/3561856/1085604037076_light_dyno_hub_set.jpg">'dynohub</a>' that powered the front and rear lights.</p>

<p>It was the dynohub that impressed me the most as it was a built it generator incorporated into the front wheel hub. This set me thinking - why couldn't an electric car have something simiilar built into all four wheel hubs in order to generate electricity to help charge the batteries on the move? My next 'innovation' was to have solar panels incorporated into the bonnet, roof and boot. Thus my dynohubs, which would actually have been more efficient alternators rather than dynamos, and solar panels would help extend the range of the car, plus the solar panels would also help to re-charge the batteries when it was parked in daylight.</p>

<p>I wish I had kept the drawing, but it's probaly just as well I didn't go into the electric car business, as oil stubbornly refused to run out. However, clearly I was 40 years ahead of my time as oil has now reached $126 per barrel and the electric car is now looking much more like a vialble option for journeys of around 40 to 100 miles per day.</p>

<p>Way back in 1899, a French electric car named <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Jamais_Contente">'La Jamais Contente,' </a> driven by Belgian Camille Jenatzy, reached the then record speed of 105.882 km/h (65.792 mph).</p>

<p><br />
<img alt="Jamais_contente.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/Jamais_contente.jpg" width="478" height="332" /><br />
<em>Photo from Wikimedia Commons</em></p>

<p><br />
For the subsequent 100 years or so, the internal combustion engine has dominated car technology. However, this may be about to change. I'd certainly like to get my hands on a new <a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20080124/146156/">Mitsubishi i MiEV </a>to replace the small <a href="http://www.peugeot.co.uk/Showrooms/ModelRange2/?target=2&Model=1PA0&GrBodyStyle=3DOORHAT">Peugeot 1007 </a>I use on my 40 mile round trip to work and back. </p>

<p><br />
<img alt="mitsubishi-i.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/mitsubishi-i.jpg" width="550" height="365" /><br />
<em>Photo from the GreenCarSite</em></p>

<p>The i MiEV is due in the UK around 2009/10 at an estimated cost of £15,000. The range will be up to 100 miles on a full charge, with a 0 to 60mph time of just 9.5 seconds and a top speed of 85mph. 10,000 miles should cost about £50 in electricity, compared to around £1000 in petrol for the internal combustion engined version.</p>

<p>For those with around $100,000 to spend, there are sports cars such as the <a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/">Tesla Roadster </a>available. No doubt as production numbers increase, prices of electric cars will become even more affordable.  Personal mobility and climate concerns solved!?</p>

<p><br />
Paul Biggs</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Wong Numbers</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003056.html" />
<modified>2008-05-14T11:53:00Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T11:27:41Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3056</id>
<created>2008-05-14T11:27:41Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">As a result of the recent budget, the Rudd government will be spending $2.3 billion over five years to &quot;tackle climate change by reducing emissions, adapting to change and helping Australia play a leadership role.&quot; An Australian climate realist recently...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>As a result of the recent <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2008-09/content/at_a_glance/html/at_a_glance.htm">budget</a>, the Rudd government will be spending $2.3 billion over five years to "tackle climate change by reducing emissions, adapting to change and helping Australia play a leadership role." </p>

<p>An Australian climate realist recently remarked, "This represents a huge pitch by Kevin Rudd for the youth and environmental vote, and helps explain why our new government has determinedly resisted listening to any alternative, wiser voices on the issue of global warming.</p>

<p>Penny Wong's new ministry (of Climate) is reputed to already have 124 staff, and that's on top of an already established federal dept. of the environment, a national greenhouse office that gets a few hundred million dollars a year, eight states and territories with both DOEs and GOs, and several major university-CSIRO research centres. The cost of maintaining such an army of bureaucrats and (by Australian standards) regiment of scientists must be in the region of $2 billion, to which treasurer Swan is now adding another couple of billion.</p>

<p>The resulting Australian figure of $4 billion annually is similar to what USA is estimated to spend on greenhouse R&D each year (though the US figure probably doesn't include all their climate bureaucracy). On a per capita basis, as for sport, Australia now appears to be 'punching above our weight'."</p>

<p>I think it's worth posting the <a href="http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/climate_change/001295chinas_growing_emis.html">graphic</a> below again:</p>

<p><br />
<img alt="China%20Emissions.png" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/China%2520Emissions.png" width="480.5" height="330.5" /></p>

<p><br />
Borrowing the phrase often attributed to UK Aussie <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Can-You-Tell-What-Autobiography/dp/1856866750">Rolf Harris</a>, " Can you tell what it is yet!?"</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Climate Tidbits</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003055.html" />
<modified>2008-05-14T10:56:46Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T10:34:09Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3055</id>
<created>2008-05-14T10:34:09Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The Amazon rainforest, so crucial to the Earth&apos;s climate system, is coming under threat from cleaner air say prominent UK and Brazilian climate scientists in the journal Nature. Science Daily: Amazon Under Threat From Cleaner Air Report: CO2 from deforestation...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>The Amazon rainforest, so crucial to the Earth's climate system, is coming under threat from cleaner air say prominent UK and Brazilian climate scientists in the journal Nature.</p>

<p>Science Daily: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080507133259.htm">Amazon Under Threat From Cleaner Air</a></p>

<p>Report: CO2 from deforestation 'far outstrip damage caused by planes and automobiles and factories' </p>

<p>Excerpt: The accelerating destruction of the rainforests that form a precious cooling band around the Earth's equator, is now being recognised as one of the main causes of climate change. Carbon emissions from deforestation far outstrip damage caused by planes and automobiles and factories. The rampant slashing and burning of tropical forests is second only to the energy sector as a source of greenhouses gases according to report published today by the Oxford-based Global Canopy Programme, an alliance of leading rainforest scientists. Figures from the GCP, summarising the latest findings from the United Nations, and building on estimates contained in the Stern Report, show deforestation accounts for up to 25 per cent of global emissions of heat-trapping gases, while transport and industry account for 14 per cent each; and aviation makes up only 3 per cent of the total. "Tropical forests are the elephant in the living room of climate change," said Andrew Mitchell, the head of the GCP.Scientists say one days' deforestation is equivalent to the carbon footprint of eight million people flying to New York. Reducing those catastrophic emissions can be achieved most quickly and most cheaply by halting the destruction in Brazil, Indonesia, the Congo and elsewhere.No new technology is needed, says the GCP, just the political will and a system of enforcement and incentives that makes the trees worth more to governments and individuals standing than felled. "The focus on technological fixes for the emissions of rich nations while giving no incentive to poorer nations to stop burning the standing forest means we are putting the cart before the horse," said Mr Mitchell.</p>

<p>The Independent: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/deforestation-the-hidden-cause-of-global-warming-448734.html">Deforestation: The hidden cause of global warming</a></p>

<p>KEVIN Rudd's climate change guru Ross Garnaut has used his newly attained expertise in the field to argue heritage traditions, such as a slate roof, should not apply to a sleek, modern house he wants to build in inner suburban Melbourne.</p>

<p>The Australian: <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23673745-11949,00.html">Garnaut heavies council over roof</a></p>

<p>WATER Commissioner Elizabeth Nosworthy says installing a pool at her home is sending "the right message" to Queenslanders coping with tough water restrictions.</p>

<p>couriermail.com.au: <a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23676289-952,00.html">Water chief defends new pool</a></p>

<p>CLIMATE change could lead to "killer cornflakes" with the most potent liver toxin ever recorded, an environmental health conference has been told.</p>

<p>news.com.au: <a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23691709-29277,00.html">Cornflakes in cereal killer warning</a></p>

<p>A $34 million solar instrument package to be built by the University of Colorado at Boulder, considered a crucial tool to help monitor global climate change, has been restored to a U.S. government satellite mission slated for launch in 2013.</p>

<p>The data from these instruments will help scientists differentiate between natural and human-caused climate change, said Pilewskie.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.colorado.edu/news/r/807d6979c7b0ad573336e583f3263096.html">CU Team To Build $34 Million Instrument Package For U.S. Environmental Satellite </a></p>

<p>Study: With locked crust, Earth could become another Venus</p>

<p>HOUSTON, May 12, 2008 -- A new study of possible links between climate and geophysics on Earth and similar planets finds that prolonged heating of the atmosphere can shut down plate tectonics and cause a planet's crust to become locked in place.</p>

<p>EurekAlert: <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-05/ru-hcc051208.php">Hot climate could shut down plate tectonics</a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Campaign Against ANZ Forest Policy Disingenuous - A Note from Alan Ashbarry</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003053.html" />
<modified>2008-05-14T07:40:01Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-14T07:30:01Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3053</id>
<created>2008-05-14T07:30:01Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The ANZ bank recently released it Forest and Biodiversity Policy as part of its corporate responsibility on the environment. The bank developed the policy over the last few years in consultation with its customers and stakeholders. The policy demands that...</summary>
<author>
<name>jennifer</name>
<url>http://www.jennifermarohasy.com</url>
<email>jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Forestry</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>The ANZ bank recently released it <a href="http://www.anz.com/aus/About-ANZ/Corporate-Responsibility/pdf/ForestsBiodiversity.pdf">Forest and Biodiversity Policy</a>  as part of its corporate responsibility on the environment.</p>

<p>The bank developed the policy over the last few years in consultation with its customers and stakeholders.</p>

<p>The policy demands that its customers when engaged in the forest industry must meet extensive criteria including independent environmental certification and the protection of high conservation value forest.  Forestry must be legal and not be undertaken in World Heritage Areas, National Parks and conservation reserves.</p>

<p>In terms of high conservation values the policy looks at international and national definitions. High conservation value forest is not defined by lobby groups such as the Wilderness Society or by the forest industry but by a fully open and transparent process.  In Australian identifying HCV forest has its roots in the 1992 National Forest Policy Statement, defined in what is known as the JANIS criteria, and implemented by the Regional Forest and Community Forest Agreements.</p>

<p>In terms of sustainable practices, ANZ will engage customers involved in large scale forestry activities to advocate credible sustainable forest management (SFM) certification. However, the bank acknowledges it is the customer’s choice on which internationally recognised certification scheme is adopted.</p>

<p>Forest certification schemes provide a way of defining sustainable forest management as well as third party, independent verification that a timber source meets the definition of sustainability. Certification schemes include a mechanism for tracing products from the certified source forest to the end use. </p>

<p>A number of certification schemes operate throughout the world. Operating in Australia are:<br />
• Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) <br />
• Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) </p>

<p>So it’s a bit surprising that our national broadcaster <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/13/2243255.htm ">The ABC </a>is running claims from the Australian Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) that ANZ's new forest policy is too broad. And that “the bank's new guidelines on providing funding for forestry and timber processing projects lacks detail.” </p>

<p>The FSC in Australia is run by a board of Directors including representatives from Timber Workers for Forests, Timber Communities Australia, The Wilderness Society, Australian Conservation Foundation, Friends of the Earth, Paperlinx, Timbercorp, Integrated Tree Cropping and one independent.  It is chaired by Sean Cadman, the National Forest Campaigner of the Wilderness Society.</p>

<p>The other certification scheme is the Australian Forest Standard that is part of the PEFC. Its Board comprises 10 Directors, with representation being four from government, three from the Forestry and Wood Products Sector, one Employee Representative, one General and up to two Independent members, one of whom is the Chair of the company, currently Geoff Gorrie.</p>

<p>In light of these schemes it is difficult to understand the motive of such criticism by the FSC, perhaps it is due the inclusion of a competing scheme by the Bank or perhaps it is due to fact the Wilderness Society is currently targeting the ANZ bank about the Tasmanian Pulp Mill?</p>

<p>In Tasmania, Forestry Tasmania, Gunns Ltd and Forest Enterprises Australia have been externally certified as complying with the international standard for environmental management systems (ISO 14001) and have also been externally certified against the Australian Forestry Standard (AS 4708) rather than the FSC.</p>

<p>Gunns Ltd has received Commonwealth and Tasmanian approval to build a pulp mill to value add woodchips that would other wise be exported from forests covered by the Regional forest Agreement. </p>

<p>Alan Ashbarry<br />
Website: <a href="http://www.tasmaniapulpmill.info/home ">http://www.tasmaniapulpmill.info/home </a><br />
About: <a href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/001252.html ">http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/001252.html </a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Australian Labor Government to Fund Desalinated Water</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003050.html" />
<modified>2008-05-13T12:22:50Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-13T11:59:56Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3050</id>
<created>2008-05-13T11:59:56Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The Honourable Wayne Swan MP, Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia, delivered the first budget for the new Labor government tonight. The listed major new iniatives in the environmental area include: $14 million for the &apos;National Urban Water and Desalination...</summary>
<author>
<name>jennifer</name>
<url>http://www.jennifermarohasy.com</url>
<email>jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Funding</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>The Honourable Wayne Swan MP, Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia, delivered the first budget for the new Labor government tonight. </p>

<p>The listed <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2008-09/content/overview/html/overview_38.htm">major new iniatives</a> in the environmental area include:</p>

<p>$14 million for the 'National Urban Water and Desalination Plan';</p>

<p>$ 108 million for a 'Solar Australia Program'; and</p>

<p>$ 34.8 million for a national clean coal fund.  </p>

<p>In the lead up to the federal election last year, Labor promised $1 billion for the National Urban Water and Desalination Plan to help secure the water supplies of Australia’s major cities with centres of excellence in desalination in Perth and a centre of excellence in water recycling in Brisbane—acknowledging these cities as leaders in these respective fields.   </p>

<p>Given the election promise, the allocation for desalination for next year is very modest.  </p>

<p>I wrote about Labor's proposed water policy in the March IPA Review: <br />
<a href="http://www.ipa.org.au/publications/publisting_detail.asp?pubid=801">http://www.ipa.org.au/publications/publisting_detail.asp?pubid=801</a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>We Live in an Electric Universe (Part 2) by Louis Hissink</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003047.html" />
<modified>2008-05-13T10:26:09Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-12T12:19:20Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3047</id>
<created>2008-05-12T12:19:20Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">&quot;The boom of thunder and crackle of lightning generally mean one thing: a storm is coming. Curiously, though, the biggest storms of all, hurricanes, are notoriously lacking in lightning. Hurricanes blow, they rain, they flood, but seldom do they crackle,&quot;...</summary>
<author>
<name>jennifer</name>
<url>http://www.jennifermarohasy.com</url>
<email>jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>"The boom of thunder and crackle of lightning generally mean one thing: a storm is coming. Curiously, though, the biggest storms of all, hurricanes, are notoriously lacking in lightning. Hurricanes blow, they rain, they flood, but seldom do they crackle," at least that was how NASA s Patrick Barry and Tony Phillips began an article entitled <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jan_electrichurricanes.htm">'Electric Hurricanes'</a> early in 2006.   The article then makes reference to three of the most powerful hurricanes of 2005 --Rita, Katrina, and Emily-- with comment that they did have lightning, in fact "lots of it".  </p>

<p>A mystery surrounding hurricanes is their actual formation, for while it is generally accepted that a warmer than usual ocean is a pre-requisite, the formation of tropical cyclones is the topic of extensive ongoing research and is still not fully understood.</p>

<p>One of the reasons why cyclone formation remains mysterious could be because we are excluding one of the largest forces in nature from our intellectual armoury – electricity. The general perception is that atmospheric turbulence creates the charge separation that produces lightning and so electrical forces are excluded from any models of weather. </p>

<p>Much the same reasoning is applied to space where charge separation is also not deemed possible.  But this attitude should have changed 100 years ago when Kristian Birkeland pointed out that the polar auroras were produced by electrical currents from the Sun, and proceeded to demonstrate that with his famous “Terrella” experiments.</p>

<p>As Hannes Alfven observed in 1948 “Nearly everything we know about the celestial universe has come from applying principles we have learnt in terrestrial physics...Yet there is one great branch of physics that up to now has told us little or nothing about astronomy.  That branch is electricity.  It is rather astonishing that this phenomenon, which has been so exhaustively studied on earth, has been of so little help in the celestial sphere”.</p>

<p>Alven’s student Anthony Peratt continued research into plasma universe theory and developed Particle in Cell simulation using the Maxwell-Lorentz equations to model plasma behaviour.  One type of simulation involved a pair of Birkeland currents in parallel and looking top row left to right, then next row left to right, was able to produce a spiral galaxy formation, (see Figure 1). The accuracy of PIC simulation is shown in its astonishing ability to mimic known galaxy shapes (Figure 2) without using gravity.</p>

<p><img alt="Louis_peratt01.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/Louis_peratt01.jpg" width="640" height="400" /></p>

<p><img alt="Louis_peratt02.jpg" src="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/Louis_peratt02.jpg" width="640" height="400" /></p>

<p>Put simply, the two parallel Birkeland currents approach and start twisting around each other, imparting a spinning motion.  This is the basic design of the Maxwell homopolar motor. Here it is the electric current that is generating the circular motion and suggests that we should be looking for signs of electrical activity in cyclones.</p>

<p>Louis Hissink<br />
Perth</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sustaining the Seas - New Issue of New Journal</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003046.html" />
<modified>2008-05-12T11:02:50Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-12T10:59:53Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3046</id>
<created>2008-05-12T10:59:53Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The new issue of The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development is online at www.ejsd.org. In this issue, &quot;Sustaining the Seas&quot;: Measuring the biological sustainability of marine fisheries: property rights, politics, and science: Michael de Alessi shows that there is currently...</summary>
<author>
<name>jennifer</name>
<url>http://www.jennifermarohasy.com</url>
<email>jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Other</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>The new issue of The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development is online at <a href="http://www.ejsd.org">www.ejsd.org</a>. </p>

<p>In this issue, "Sustaining the Seas": </p>

<p>Measuring the biological sustainability of marine fisheries: property rights, politics, and science: Michael de Alessi shows that there is currently no adequate measurement for biological performance in fisheries. His paper addresses the impact of scientific uncertainty on fisheries management both typically and in New Zealand, critiques current methods for measuring biological sustainability, and proposes measuring the likelihood of sustainability based on the quality of the harvest model.</p>

<p>Sustainability of Fisheries: Rögnvaldur Hannesson shows that stock levels may be affected both by environmental factors, such as the warmth of the oceans, and by catch levels. By considering various instances of fisheries collapse, he provides insights into the factors necessary for creating sustainable fisheries. </p>

<p>The historical development of fisheries in New Zealand with respect to sustainable development principles: Mark T. Gibbs reviews the development history of New Zealand’s fisheries and addresses the question whether an ITQ (individual transferable quota) scheme is a necessary or sufficient condition to achieving sustainable regional fisheries.</p>

<p>Iceland’s ITQ system creates new wealth: Ragnar Arnason analyses the impact of ITQs in Iceland's fisheries since their introduction in the 1980s. These ITQs, which are freely traded in the market, have become highly valuable. There are indications that this new source of financial capital has induced economic growth in Iceland far beyond the fishery itself.</p>

<p>Books reviews by Wilfred Beckerman, Karol Boudreaux, Bill Durodié, Terence Kealey, Jeremy Rabkin, James M. Sheehan and Philip Stott.</p>

<p>A Note "On the Limits to Knowledge of Future Marine Biodiversity" by Jesse H. Ausubel.</p>

<p>Best Regards,</p>

<p>Caroline Boin <br />
Managing Editor,  <br />
Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development<br />
<a href="http://www.ejsd.org">www.ejsd.org</a> </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Potential Role for Arctic Currents in Global Warming</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/003045.html" />
<modified>2008-05-12T07:28:46Z</modified>
<issued>2008-05-12T07:15:04Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.jennifermarohasy.com,2008:/blog//9.3045</id>
<created>2008-05-12T07:15:04Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Temperatures in the Arctic are rising far faster than in other parts of the world. Climate models produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which are tuned to reproduce the human-made greenhouse effect, predict the region should have...</summary>
<author>
<name>Paul</name>

<email>p.m.biggs@bham.ac.uk</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Climate (Part 3 from March 2008)</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Temperatures in the Arctic are rising far faster than in other parts of the world. Climate models produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which are tuned to reproduce the human-made greenhouse effect, predict the region should have warmed by 1.4 °C between 1960 and 2000. In fact, the Arctic's average air temperature rose by 2.2 °C. </p>

<p>Vladimir Semenov of the Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics in Moscow, Russia, says that ocean currents carrying warm water from lower latitudes into polar regions could have played a part in this increase. He analysed air temperature data from the north Atlantic, which revealed a cyclic pattern of highs and lows over the past century. He argues the length of such cycles must be explained by ocean currents, which also fluctuate over a timescale of decades.</p>

<p>Between 1970 and 2000, the average temperature of the northern hemisphere increased by 0.5 °C. Semenov calculates that the natural process he outlined may have been responsible for around 0.2 °C.</p>

<p>New Scientist Environment: <a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/article/mg19826533.900-arctic-currents-may-be-warming-the-world.html">Arctic currents may be warming the world </a> (subscription required to read full article).</p>

<p>Conference poster: <a href="http://acsys.npolar.no/meetings/final/abstracts/posters/Session_3/poster_s3_096.pdf">A mechanism for the early 20th century warming in the Arctic: a missing link</a> Lennart Bengtsson, Vladimir A. Semenov and Ola M. Johannessen</p>

<p>Thanks to Luke for alerting us to this interesting research.<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>